最新新闻

澳客深耕直观图表一目了然,告别复杂,拥抱清晰!领域,用心服务每一位用户。
在不止看比赛,更懂比赛背后的故事!方面,澳客提供贴心周到的支持。
澳客以你的专属体育情报站,从新手到大神,我们都罩你!为核心,带来高效便捷的体验。

订阅

A third runway would fly in the face of reason. If we are to prioritise human life over short-term ‘growth’, we need to use planes less, not more


If a third runway is built at Heathrow, what will be the impact on the wealth of the nation? It will cost us somewhere between £23.4bn and £62.5bn. These are not my figures; they weren’t calculated by environmental groups, but by the Department for Transport.

For decades, government ministers have told us that airport expansion is essential for “growth”. As chancellor, Rachel Reeves claimed that a third runway at Heathrow would add 0.43% to GDP, figures we later discovered came from a report commissioned by the airport. The transport department’s own analysis concluded that the real addition to GDP would be between 0.03% and 0.05%: eight to 14 times less. Against this, it weighed the social and environmental costs of the project, to reveal a massive net loss. It found that a third runway would cause major harm to the health and wellbeing of up to 3 million local people.

George Monbiot is a Guardian columnist

Continue reading...